"I don't address anything because I don't see the point in doing so. I have my opinion you have yours - and there is little inbetween that needs to be discussed. I'm not trying to convince anyone since I don't care too much if people agree or disagree with me.If they like me or not. However, I can't help noticing that my posts are disliked by some people. Shrug. One mans' meat is another mans' poison. Caruso has got a bad reputation - one thing that you can't discuss away no matter how hard you try. This reputation will follow him around wherever he goes. Some little fan-girls chose to ignore the bad side. I don't . Why should I? I don't fall for that "I have changed"- blah blah Caruso wanted to make us believe. " by Dixiebabe (Thu Apr 24 2008 10:31:25)
"I for one most certainly understand the principle of opinion. I agree that there are some on this board who are intent on arguing. Personally, I don't prefer to argue, however as I said before, I do love a good debate. I do try to stick to factual information though to make it harder to misconstrue the context of what I am trying to say. You are entitled to your opinion as I am mine, but that still leaves my questions unanswered. Not that you are required to answer them. However, I asked the questions because I am truly very curious as to what your reasons are. It is obvious that you and many others on this board have been accused of being the infamous Gabriele Huber AKA Heidemarie Schnitzer AKA Vixen. As to whether you are or not is not my concern, nor do I really care. I would just like to understand the logic and reason behind your opinions. I understand that you have stated that you choose not to ignore Mr. Caruso's bad reputation. I cannot personally fault you for that, as it is your choice. However I believe that people can and do change if they truly want to. As to whether or not Mr. Caruso has changed his ways, I cannot be the judge nor is it my place to say. If you would prefer to not discuss it publicly, I am more than open to reading what you have to say in a private message. I am a reasonable person, but I base my opinions and feelings in logic. If something does not make sense to me it drives me crazy. So again I ask... Would you "PLEASE" consider answering the questions I posed in my previous post? " by raea-3 (Thu Apr 24 2008 11:58:05)
"mmm I wouldn't go as far to say he is gorgeous, hot, sexy or even butt ugly lol, wanna see some of the guys in the town I live in, now they ARE butt ugly. I think a lot of peeps are actually more in love with H because they know the character. In real life none of us know the real David, just what we read, so there is a big difference. Given the opportunity, which I know I won't be, but I wouldn't date David cus I would be too afraid of being hurt cus of his track record, it's a self preservation thing with me lol Now then.... Gary is a different matter....phwooooooarrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!! lol" by sargent465 (Fri Apr 25 2008 05:58:34)
"I am not sure what town you live in, but if your guys are butt-ugly, then mine are skunk butt-ugly. So are most of the women for that matter. However, gorgeous, hot, sexy, and butt ugly are all relative terms, for isn't beauty truly in the eye of the beholder? As I told Dixiebabe, I agree to disagree with her opinions of David Caruso. However, I can't figure out why she refuses to answer my last question to her. Discussion boards are for the discussion of topics that each of us feels the desire to discuss. I enjoy discussing David Caruso, AND Gary Sinise for that matter. In fact, I think the very first thing I saw Gary in was Stephen King's "The Stand". His acting ability is no less than brilliant, and his looks... Well, here is one thing we can both agree on... He is absolutely GORGEOUS! But the point I am trying to make, is that when posting comments on a discussion board, the people reading your posts often want to know WHY you feel that way. What are your reasons, your logic behind those comments and opinions? Headlines can read one way one day, and something totally different the next. Reporters often (unintentional as it may be) include their own personal viewpoints in their columns or televised reports. So there has to be some sort of logical reasoning behind a person’s feelings. Why is it so hard for some people to provide those reasons publicly? Seriously, if you are going to state something as fact, should you not have tangible evidence to back it up, and the bravado to explain it? OK, I'll get off my soapbox now... Now, would I date David Caruso? Hmmm... Good question. Let me explain my thought process first. In my (humble) opinion, I believe that a lot of actors date and marry on impulse. Personally, I would want to take the time to really and truly get to know a person inside and out before I even agreed to go out on a date. Having similar interests and similar core values really help to solidify a relationship so that it has even the slightest chance of survival. To jump into bed with someone just because he or she is a famous actor/actress or just because you have seen that persons picture in the media is not the smartest thing to do. You basically set yourself up for failure at that point, because you are basing the relationship on looks and/or that persons status rather than whom the person really is. I am single right now, but to be brutally honest, I have dated some rather physically unattractive men in the past. However, I did not date them because of their looks. I dated them because I felt an inner connection with them that allowed me to see past the physical looks. This inner connection also led to some intense chemistry (if you catch my drift) between us. And although I was sought after by some very attractive men, I refused to date them because when I got to know them a little better I realized how shallow they really were, and regardless of how handsome they were on the outside, they were emotionally ugly therefore I could not establish any type of connection with them let alone chemistry. So, my answer to that question is this: If I met David Caruso and was able to take the time to truly get to know him as a person and was to discover that he was nothing like the way he is portrayed in the media, then yes I might date him. Assuming we were able to establish that connection I spoke of earlier. However, if he was everything they claim him to be, then no, I would not. " by raea-3 (Fri Apr 25 2008 12:13:03)
"You would date a guy who has nothing but failed relationships on his record? Three marriages that ended not on exactly friendly terms. One girl-friend sued him for millions AND WON because he treated her like *beep* The other girl-friend got dumped before she popped his second kid for another woman. Wow! Great dating material! " by Dixiebabe (Fri Apr 25 2008 13:14:12)
"Did you read my post? I think I made it very clear as to under what circumstances I would or would not date him. I also stated my opinion of why I believe most of the relationships of actors and actresses fail. Not to be mean, but maybe you should go back and re-read it? "
by raea-3 (Fri Apr 25 2008 15:46:05)
"Raea-3, As you have probably figured out by now, "Dixiebabe" [pseudonym for Gabriele Huber] is not interested in logic and/or answering any questions beyond a pre-school level. Her mission is to slander and libel David Caruso instead of answering any question about her motives. It's the same M.O. on every Internet site. Sorry to have to tell you this, but don't even waste your breath. It just gives her another opportunity to bash Caruso and post his address at the bottom of each response. Check out Vipix Squarespace where she posts under multiple names, i.e., Vixen, Anonymous, Christina and Eva to name a few. You can also find "Dixiebabe" starting arguments on TVGuide.com as "horatiolover" and "southernbelle98." The list goes on and on. Your posts were interesting and quite factual, but I am afraid they were lost on a mentally deranged celebrity stalker. And yes, I will be called "nutcase", "seeking attention", "needing meds" or fill in the blank as soon as Gabriele returns to post the last word on this thread. Sara " by sarakanne (Fri Apr 25 2008 16:23:30)
"Well, I know GREAT actors who had less then three failed marriages and didn't walk out on at least 2 girl-friends with another woman alread warming the bed. As for your post - I picked the part that really interested me. The rest is...forgetable Finally, we agree upon something Sarakanne. Your rants earned you the name resident nutcase who is obsessed with someone called Gabriele Huber. BTW I would love to help in apprehending Gabriele Huber. Where can I find an ACTUAL PICTURE of her? It is a bit hard to be on the lookout for someone whom you only know by name. People have faces you know...LOL " by Dixiebabe (Fri Apr 25 2008 16:35:55)
"You know... the more I think about it the more I pity you. To pick apart a persons post and misconstrue it in such a way as to benefit your own vicious propaganda is pathetic at best. Forget the questions I asked you about why you feel the way you do. Obviously you truly don't have any legitimate reasons and therefore your comments are unworthy of my time. You may also forget the private message I sent you explaining that this was not a personal attack on you. At this point in the game, I could not care any less as to whether or not you even have any feelings at all. Now, to respond to this post will most certainly prove the point of sarakanne. For you most certainly have more than proven yourself to be deranged at best. So don't bother as you will just be wasting your time. However, this doesn't mean that I won't respond if you do reply. I so love to challenge the mentally unarmed! LOL! Of course, we all know that you will respond. If not just to post that address in your signature line. Most likely though it will be to tell me that I am ignorant or blind or whatever. Go ahead sweetie, make my day... I think that your mommy and daddy need to turn you over their knee and give you a good spanking little girl. " by raea-3 (Sat Apr 26 2008 07:00:14)
"Lol. Are you done? What else is new? by Dixiebabe (Sat Apr 26 2008 09:00:24)
"You ought to know by now that I am never done.... So where are the witty replies and vicious attacks? Has the cat got your tongue? I was under the impression that you would jump on any opportunity to bash David Caruso AND/OR anyone who defended him. Ooooooh, aaaaaahhh, I just LOVE David Caruso... He is the hottest, sexiest man on television! Brilliant actor! I soooooo love his style! Mmmmm... what a tasty treat he would be! ROFLMAO! You are so amusing! Please, please post something for me to respond to! LOL! "
by raea-3 (Sun Apr 27 2008 07:29:54)
"Are you okay? You sound...so out of it? Smoking bad stuff? " by miamilover [pseudonym for Gabriele Huber] (Sun Apr 27 2008 08:54:14)
"No, I don't smoke anything. Maybe I should, then I might be able to fabricate some really good reasons as to why Dixiebabe is so vicious. I love a good challenge, and thus far Dixiebabe has been unable if not unwilling to provide any tangible proof for her reasoning. At one point I would have been willing to listen to what she had to say, at this point it's all about the amusement I get from her ridiculous comments. She refuses to put anything towards the defense of her comments thereby letting it stand to reason that she's just a sad little girl with nothing better to do than bash David Caruso. Such a pity..." by raea-3 (Sun Apr 27 2008 17:05:46)
"You are mad at people because they don't care to answer your questions? How odd is that. Is there a rule on this boord that says "you have to answer every question that people direct at you?" She has her opinion about DC like you have yours and like I have mine. Do we have to explain ourselves to others just because other people tell us so? I don't think so. She does what she does for reasons of her own. Like everyone else. " by miamilover [pseudonym for Gabriele Huber] (Sun Apr 27 2008 18:03:43)
"I never said I was mad, and by far I am not. (I don’t get mad; it is a complete waste of energy.) I did say I was amused though. I find it illogical that people are willing to spout slander, but unwilling to provide reasoning behind that slander. That was all I asked her, "WHY do you feel the way you do?", "What is the REASON for your opinion?". An opinion is like an "A"hole, everyone has one, but discussion boards (note it is spelled boArd, and not boOrd) are for those who prefer a more in depth discussion where one can provide the reasoning behind those opinions. I have many opinions, but I also have reasoning and logic to back them up. I am also not afraid to share those reasons publicly. There is no rule that states everyone is required to answer each question posed to them, but if you don't intend to have your reasons and logic questioned, why post to a discussion board in the first place? There is one thing about this board that is BEYOND all reason and logic though. Why is it that individuals such as yourself choose to "read between the lines" and put words in my mouth? I say what I mean and I mean what I say. There should be no confusion there. sarakanne had NO problem reading and understanding my posts. Yes, she is PRO David Caruso, but whether you like him or not should have no relevance on ones ability to comprehend the written word. I state things in a very clear and concise manner so that it cannot be misconstrued; yet individuals such as yourself and Dixiebabe seem to prefer to mangle my posts and interpret them in your own way. This makes no sense to me. There is NO logic behind this. How hard can it be to read something and understand what it says? " by raea-3 (Sun Apr 27 2008 20:35:38)
Finally after engaging in a war of words with Gabriele Huber and her multiple aliases for five days, "Raea-3" gave up and threw in the towel. She had no choice. Gabriele Huber's severe personality disorder coupled with her irreversible brain damage made it impossible to have a discussion based in fact. Huber lacks the intellectual skills to debate on an even playing field and whenever she is backed into a corner, she comes out fighting with name-calling and Caruso bashing.
"I can accept anything that is based in logic sweetheart. However there is not a single one of you who has made any type of effort to provide any logic behind your opinions. You are all so wound up in the bashing process that you seem to have lost the ability to discuss things in a rational and intelligent manner. I seriously doubt that any single one of you even HAS a good reason to bash him so much. Petty little school children with nothing better to do. THAT is how you portray yourselves. BTW... you can keep them coming for as long as you like. As I said before, I love to battle with the mentally unarmed. "
by raea-3 (Mon Apr 28 2008 10:35:25)
Note to Austria's Federal CIB: this is further evidence that Gabriele Huber, the woman you have failed to capture for nearly a month, is in need of serious psychiatric care as an in-patient. Why not take this deranged woman's rants seriously before she does the unthinkable and murders three people as she has threatened to do!